(For USM Staff/Student Only)

EngLib USM > Ω School of Civil Engineering >

Comparison between an existing 4 storey rc school building in malaysia with and without consideration of seismic load/Hafifi Jamal Abdul Nasir

Comparison between an existing 4 storey rc school building in malaysia with and without consideration of seismic load_Hafifi Jamal Abdul Nasir_A9_2011_NI
Sebelum bencana alam yang dikenali sebagai tsunami yang disebabkan oleh gempa bumi yang kuat di dasar Lautan Hindi pada Disember 2004, majoriti rakyat Malaysia tidak mengambil tahu dan peduli tentang betapa bahayanya gempa bumi dan kesannya. Bagaimanapun, selepas beberapa negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia dan Sabah mengalami dan merasai gegaran yang di sebabkan oleh gempa bumi yang berlaku di negara jiran seperi Filipina dan Indonesia, masyarakat mula membuka mata dan tertanya-tanya mengenai kemampuan bangunan yang ada di Malaysia untuk menahan gegaran kesan daripada gempa bumi. Masalah tersebut telah menjadi satu isu sama ada ianya dapat menahan kesan daripada beban gempa bumi. Tujuan utama kajian ini dilakukan untuk membandingkan perbezaan peratusan dalam konteks besi tetulang dan konkrit (untuk rasuk dan tiang) di antara sekolah yang direkabentuk sedia ada dengan sekolah yang direkabentuk dengan mengambil kira beban seismik berdasarkan kepada UBC 97. Sebuah sekolah yang biasanya direkabentuk di Malaysia telah dipilih dan mempunyai ketinggian sebanyak 4 tingkat. Oleh kerana Malaysia berada di dalam kawasan yang rendah ke sederhana tahap seismiknya, kod UBC 97 mengkategorikan untuk kawasan seperti ini adalah 2B. Analisis sekolah ini menggunakan kaedah statik dan perisian Staad-Pro 2007. Hasil daripada analisis yang dilakukan, jumlah perbezaan peratus konkrit di antara sekolah sedia ada dengan seismik sebanyak 14.1% manakala dari segi besi tetulang sebanyak 20.37% ___________________________________________________________________________________ Before the disaster of „The Terrible Tsunami‟ caused by strong Indian Ocean earthquake in December 2004, majority of Malaysian citizen does not worry about earthquake hazard. However, after experienced several tremors in Sabah and Peninsular Malaysia due to earthquakes that occurred in the Philippines and Indonesia, the question about the ability of buildings in Malaysia to withstand the tremors are increasing. The safety of buildings in Malaysia subjected to seismic loading had become an issue. The main objective of this dissertation is to compare the percentage difference in term of steel tonnage and concrete volume (for beams and columns) between the existing school previously designed under gravity loads only and when considering seismic force based on UBC 97. One model of school was selected, rectangular in plan consisting of 4 stories which is generally used in Malaysia. Since Malaysia is in low to moderate seismicity region, UBC 97 code assigns zone 2B for such a region. The schools are under the category of regular structures can be analyzed using static method. The seismic analysis is performed using STAAD-Pro 2007 software. The structures are designed using Intermediate Moment Resisting Frame (IMRF) according to the UBC 97 and ACI 95 recommendations. The total percentage difference of the concrete volume for the school between the existing (without seismic provision) and seismic design is 14.1%, where the total percentage difference of the steel tonnage is 20.37%.
Contributor(s):
Hafifi Jamal Abdul Nasir - Author
Primary Item Type:
Final Year Project
Language:
English
Subject Keywords:
disaster ; tsunami ; earthquake
First presented to the public:
5/1/2011
Original Publication Date:
3/13/2020
Previously Published By:
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Place Of Publication:
School of Civil Engineering
Citation:
Extents:
Number of Pages - 111
License Grantor / Date Granted:
  / ( View License )
Date Deposited
2020-03-13 11:36:22.669
Submitter:
Nor Hayati Ismail

All Versions

Thumbnail Name Version Created Date
Comparison between an existing 4 storey rc school building in malaysia with and without consideration of seismic load/Hafifi Jamal Abdul Nasir1 2020-03-13 11:36:22.669